?, How many of Zaniflex and Elavil combined does it take to overdose?, How much Li in 300mg Lithium Carbonate?, Does anyone know how long the side effects of haldol last?, fluoxetine?, Stores that carry Zoft stress gum in west SD area?, How good is the medicine clozaril?, Has anyone been put on Sarafem?How does it work?, Prescribed Atarax for anxiety, how can I get stronger medication?, Have you used Sinequan for anxiety?, How long does Seroquel take to wear off?, Has anonye tired the antidepressant Emsam? Dsoe it wrok? Is it available in the UK?, How soon can I start Buspar after stopping Prozac?, What are the Prozac withdrawal side effects and how long it will last?, Lexapro helped my depression and social anxiety a bit but not all the way, could Paxil work better?, What happens if you take Geodon and you are not Bipolar?, Whats the difference between Zyban and Wellbutrin?, Can you still drink and take Pamelor (Notriptyline) meds?, Whats the difference between Paxil and Cipralex?, Is trazodone(desyrel) worth taking for anxiety and sleep problems?, People on Wellbutrin SR: How many hours do you usually wait to take your second pill?, How many Cymbalta tablets would it take to kill yourself?, What is the difference between cymbalta and effexor xr?, What are the effects of Seroquel and does it really work?, Does anyone take Endep 10 for fibromyalgia or similiar symptoms and if so does it help?, citalopram?, What are some foods with a lot of vitamin B-1?, Paroxetine?, 5-htp.?!?, How long do withdrawl symptoms for tofranil last?, zoloft????, Have you had a positive experience with Tavist, Chlortrimeton, Atarax, or Benadryl in treating dogs allergies, Should sinequan (doxepin) be taken on a full or empty stomach?, Should sinequan (doxepin) be taken on a full or empty stomach?, How effective is the EMSAM patch in treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder?, How effective is the EMSAM patch in treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder?, How does Prozac help to get rid of depression?, What are the side effects between addrell and pamelor?, How long does it take buspar to leave your system?, What is the difference between Zyban and Champix?, Whats the difference between Lexapro and Citalopram?, How long does it take for Paxil to get out of your system?, Is there a big difference between wellbutrin sr and the wellbutrin xl?, What are the differences between Seroquel and seroquel XR?, How long does Cymbalta stay in the body?, Is it normal for a psychiatrist to prescribe 20mg of Geodon?, What effects are there while taking Effexor XR when you actually dont have any depression or anxiety?, Does anyone know if there is a generic available for the drug Trazodone/Desyrel?, Does anyone out there take Sinequan(doxepin) or Symbax and what effects have you experienced?, Can taking Celexa interfere with the ability to get pregnant?, how many atarax pills should i take to calm me?, Has anyone used Emsam and how did you like it?, How long does 10mg of Prozac take to get into your system to feel effects?, How long after stop taking Lexapro can I expect to lose weight?, Has anyone ever been on the drug Pamelor?, How long until the drug Buspar starts working?, What exactly is the difference between Paxil and Paxil CR?, what are side effects of smoking marijuana on wellbutrin sr?, Trazodone (Desyrel) As A Sleep Aid?, Has anyone heard of Sinequan?, If you are bipolar and take Geodon what are your side effects?, How long should the discontinuation symptoms of suddenly stopping Effexor XR last?, Whats the difference between Zyban and Wellburtin?, What could you mix with seroquel to get high?, What is the difference in taking Cymbalta at night or in the morning?, Has anyone had experience with the antidepressant patch Emsam?, Precribed Atarax for anxiety at 36 weeks pregnant - is this safe for baby?, Can someone describe to me the affects of Xanax and Buspar?, How should take Paxil 10mg to treat premature ejaculation?, Is anyone else having the same side effects to Wellbutrin SR?, What is the difference between Effexor tablets and Effexor XR?, Could I take Prozac during the day and Mirtazapine at night to sleep?, Is Lexapro more effective for anxiety if taken in the morning before I start my day??, What is the difference between Celexa and Welbutrin?, Which of these Medication: Imipramine or Pamelor has stronger effects when taking it?, Lets talk Paxil, the pros and cons, also does anyone currently take Doxepin(Sinequan) ?, Anyone used Zyban effectively to quit smoking? How did it work for you?, How can I ask my therapist about going of medication?, Any suggestions on how to combat hangover effects from Seroquel?, Has anyone taken Emsam? What was your experience, side effects, etc?, What is the average dose of cymbalta for depression?, Question about Geodon- I have a health course need an answer about the medicine?, Anyone take Atarax? Likes/Dislikes? I am supposed to start it but I am worried about starting new meds.?, Has anyone dealt with anger and hostility while on Buspar?, How long will I have withdrawls with 75 mg of effexor xr?, Can Pamelor cause Asthma or Respiratory troubles to become worse?, How long does paxil take to get out of your system?, What will happen if I just stop taking Wellbutrin SR 150?, What to expect to pay for Prozac and where can i find it the cheapest?, What is the problem with Zyban (for smokers) and alcohol?, How long will it take for Lexapro to leave my system?, Can you lose weight while taking geodon and cymbalta?, what does a person do when the drugest gives wrong medicine?, Has anyone here tried Desyrel?, How long does it take for Seroquel to start working?, Anyone take Emsam? What side effects have you had?, How long does it take for Cymbalta to be in the system and dull the appetite?, Can I buy Atarax over the counter without prescription in the UK?, How long does it take to get over Buspar withdrawal?, Has anyone had the experience of changing from Effexor-XR to Cymbalta? How did you find it?, How long does it take for Paxil CR to be out of your system so it will not show up on a blood test?, How to buy Bupripion (Wellbutrin/Zyban) in China without prescription?, How long do Lexapro withdrawl symptoms last?, can antidepressants such as nortriptyline (pamelor) cause hyporthyroidism?, Have you ever been on Wellbutrin SR? What were your results?, What are the side effects to taking Seroquel?, What do you know about adding Prozac to Wellbutrin regimen?, Can you smoke the pill, Trazodone (Desyrel)?, Will I gain weight while on Geodon? What is the best anti-paranoia medication that causes weight loss?, What are some common side-effects of discontinuing Celexa?, Emsam seems pretty new. Does anyone have any personal experience, pro or con, with it?, How long will the side effect of Cymbalta of blurred vision last?, Which is better, Atarax (hydroxyzine) or Benadryl for a non-emergency episode of angioedema of the lips?, Has anyone taken Effexor XR and felt the effects almost immediately?, Do Buspar pills help with decreasing opiate withdraw symptoms?, How much dosage of seroquel for maintenance bipolar l?, How bad is the withdrawal sydrome for Paxil?, Why cant you take Zyban if you have had bulimia or anorexia?, i want to kanow is pamelor a good pain medication.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:Very good
- Music:Namie Amuro
Mania is the word that describes the activated phase of bipolar disorder. The symptoms of mania may include:
* either an elated, happy mood or an irritable, angry, unpleasant mood
* increased physical and mental activity and energy
* racing thoughts and flight of ideas
* increased talking, more rapid speech than normal
* ambitious, often grandiose plans
* risk taking
* impulsive activity such as spending sprees, sexual indiscretion, and alcohol abuse
* decreased sleep without experiencing fatigue
What are the symptoms of depression?
Depression is the other phase of bipolar disorder. The symptoms of depression may include:
* loss of energy
* prolonged sadness
* decreased activity and energy
* restlessness and irritability
* inability to concentrate or make decisions
* increased feelings of worry and anxiety
* less interest or participation in, and less enjoyment of activities normally enjoyed
* feelings of guilt and hopelessness
* thoughts of suicide
* change in appetite (either eating more or eating less)
* change in sleep patterns (either sleeping more or sleeping less)
What is a state?
A mixed state is when symptoms of mania and depression occur at the same time. During a mixed state depressed mood accompanies manic activation.
What is rapid cycling?
Sometimes individuals may experience an increased frequency of episodes. When four or more episodes of illness occur within a 12-month period, the individual is said to have bipolar disorder with rapid cycling. Rapid cycling is more common in women.
What are the causes of bipolar disorder?
While the exact cause of bipolar disorder is not known, most scientists believe that bipolar disorder is likely caused by multiple factors that interact with each other to produce a chemical imbalance affecting certain parts of the brain. Bipolar disorder often runs in families, and studies suggest a genetic component to the illness. A stressful environment or negative life events may interact with an underlying genetic or biological vulnerability to produce the disorder. There are other possible of bipolar episodes: the treatment of depression with an antidepressant medication may trigger a switch into mania, sleep deprivation may trigger mania, or hypothyroidism may produce depression or mood instability. It is important to note that bipolar episodes can and often do occur without any obvious trigger.
How is bipolar disorder treated?
While there is no cure for bipolar disorder, it is a treatable and manageable illness. After an accurate diagnosis, most people can achieve an optimal level of wellness. Medication is an essential element of successful treatment for people with bipolar disorder. In addition, psychosocial therapies including cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, family therapy, and psychoeducation are important to help people understand the illness and to internalize skills to cope with the stresses that can trigger episodes. Changes in medications or doses may be necessary, as well as changes in treatment plans during different stages of the illness.
It is useful to know whether the mood stabilizing medication prescribed has been approved by the FDA for use in bipolar disorder:
Medications for Mania:
Currently FDA approved: lithium (Eskalith or Lithobid), divalproex sodium (Depakote), carbamazepine (Tegretol), olanzapine (Zyprexa), risperidone (Risperdal), quetiapine (Seroquel), ziprasidone (Geodon), aripiprazole (Abilify)
At least one adequate well controlled study with positive data: haloperidol (Haldol)
Medications for bipolar depression:
Currently FDA approved: combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine (Symbyax)
Also at least one adequate well controlled study with positive data: quetiapine (Seroquel) and lamotrigine (Lamictal)
Medications for preventing (or delaying) recurrence:
Currently FDA approved: lithium (Eskalith or Lithobid), lamotrigine (Lamictal), olanzapine (Zyprexa), and aripiprazole (Abilify)
Frequently a combination of two or more medications is used, especially during severe episodes of acute mania or depression.
Medication specifics and possible side effects:
Lithium has long been used as a first line treatment for acute mania in people with bipolar disorder for more than 50 years. It generally has more positive impact when used earlier, rather than later, in the course of bipolar disorder. Research shows it is most effective in those individuals with a family history of the illness, and in those experiencing the bipolar I sequence of swings between mania and depression with return to normal function between episodes.
Like all medications, lithium treatment produces side effects. The most common ones are dose-related and can be effectively managed, but for about 30 percent of people who try it, lithium is not tolerable. Lithium side effects may include frequent urination, excessive thirst, weight gain, memory problems, hand tremors, gastrointestinal problems, hair loss, acne, and water retention. There are two important lithium side effects, that can be effectively monitored by a simple blood test: 1)hypothyroidism, which mimics depression and can be easily treated, and 2) less commonly, damage to kidney functions.
Anti-convulsants: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved divalproex sodium (Depakote) in 1995 for treating bipolar episodes. Originally approved in 1983 as a drug to treat epilepsy, Depakote was found to be as effective as lithium for treating acute mania, and appears to be better than lithium in treating the more complex bipolar subtypes of rapid cycling and dysphoric mania, as well as co-morbid substance abuse. In addition, Depakote may be safely given in larger doses to treat acute episodes, and works faster in this situation than lithium. The generic version of this drug is valproic acid. Some people find that the generic version produces more gastrointestinal distress than Depakote.
Depakote may also produce sedation and gastrointestinal distress, but these side effects often resolve during the first six months of treatment, or with dose adjustment. Another dose-related side effect is weight gain, and rare liver and pancreatic function problems may develop while taking Depakote. However, Depakote is generally well-tolerated, and is now prescribed far more often then lithium. Recent controlled trials indicate that the combination of Depakote and lithium is more effective in preventing relapse and recurrence than treatment with lithium alone.
Lamictal (lamotrigine), another anti-convulsant, is effective in the treatment of acute depression in bipolar I and II and in promoting remissions between episodes. For most people, Lamictal has a very tolerable side effect profile. Rarely, this medication can cause a rash serious enough to cause a medical emergency. The risk of this one potentially serious side effect can be reduced by starting with a low dose and going slowly in increasing the dose.
Use of Antidepressants
Standard antidepressant medications (those approved for the treatment of unipolar depression) have not yet been proven effective for bipolar depression. Although the evidence supporting their use for bipolar depression is limited to small or less rigorous studies, these medications remain the most commonly used treatment for bipolar depression. The data from larger studies finds neither evidence of benefit nor evidence that these agents cause large numbers of depressed patients to switch into mania.
Use of Antipsychotic Medications as Mood Stabilizers
To control acute episodes, antipsychotic medications may be used alone (monotherapy), or added to anti-convulsant medications (combination therapy). Medication guidelines now recommend the combination of these two medications as most effective for acute manic episodes. Because the older typical antipsychotic medications run the risk of causing permanent movement disorder, and have been associated with depression when used over the long term, the new atypical antipsychotics are now preferred for this purpose. All the new atypicals are effective in the treatment of acute and mixed mania. Olanzapine (Zyprexa) and risperidone (Risperdal) are FDA-approved for this purpose.
Finding the right preventive/maintenance medicine is an art informed by science and your own observations. Not all medicines that work in the acute phase of mania are as strong in preventing the next episode, so this is an area to explore.
Side effects of the atypicals are different than with first-generation antipsychotics (such as Haldol), although sedation, weight gain, and risk of diabetes are problems associated with many of the new antipsychotics. Clozapine and olanzapine, both effective antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, offer the most risk in this area. Weight gain is a serious clinical concern related to all atypical antipsychotics, and to anti-convulsants as well. Not only can weight gain lead to adult onset also known as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, but being overweight is also now the leading cause of medication non-adherence. Doctors advise weekly monitoring of weight in the early stages of taking these medications, along with regular exercise and healthy diets, and people must be willing to make lifestyle changes to maintain optimal health. The FDA has noted an association between all atypical antipsychotics and the risk of diabetes. As the science develops in this area, it will continue to inform medicine choices for the person that best reflect their risks and benefits.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:More emotions
- Music:Chage and Aska
CounterPunch
January 26, 2009
How Obama's New Rules Keep Intact
The Torture Ban That Doesn't Ban Torture By ALLAN NAIRN
If you're lying on the slab still breathing, with your torturer hanging over you, you don't much care if he is an American or a mere United States - sponsored trainee.
When President Obama declared flatly this week that "the United States will not torture" many people wrongly believed that he'd shut the practice down, when in fact he'd merely repositioned it.
Obama's Executive Order bans some -- not all -- US officials from torturing but it does not ban any of them, himself included, from sponsoring torture overseas.
Indeed, his policy change affects only a slight percentage of US-culpable tortures and could be completely consistent with an increase in US-backed torture worldwide.
The catch lies in the fact that since Vietnam, when US forces often tortured directly, the US has mainly seen its torture done for it by proxy -- paying, arming, training and guiding foreigners doing it, but usually being careful to keep Americans at least one discreet step removed.
That is, the US tended to do it that way until Bush and Cheney changed protocol, and had many Americans laying on hands, and sometimes taking digital photos.
The result was a public relations fiasco that enraged the US establishment since by exposing US techniques to the world it diminished US power.
But despite the outrage, the fact of the matter was that the Bush/Cheney tortures being done by Americans were a negligible percentage of all of the tortures being done by US clients.
For every torment inflicted directly by Americans in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo and the secret prisons, there were many times more being meted out by US-sponsored foreign forces.
Those forces were and are operating with US military, intelligence, financial or other backing in Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Jordan, Indonesia, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Colombia, Nigeria, and the Philippines, to name some places, not to mention the tortures sans-American-hands by the US-backed Iraqis and Afghans.
What the Obama dictum ostensibly knocks off is that small percentage of torture now done by Americans while retaining the overwhelming bulk of the system's torture, which is done by foreigners under US patronage.
Obama could stop backing foreign forces that torture, but he has chosen not to do so.
His Executive Order instead merely pertains to treatment of "...an individual in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, in any armed conflict..." which means that it doesn't even prohibit direct torture by Americans outside environments of "armed conflict," which is where much torture happens anyway since many repressive regimes aren't in armed conflict.
And even if, as Obama says, "the United States will not torture," it can still pay, train, equip and guide foreign torturers, and see to it that they, and their US patrons, don't face local or international justice.
This is a return to the status quo ante, the torture regime of Ford through Clinton, which, year by year, often produced more US-backed strapped-down agony than was produced during the Bush/Cheney years.
Under the old -- now new again -- proxy regime Americans would, say, teach interrogation/torture, then stand in the next room as the victims screamed, feeding questions to their foreign pupils. That's the way the US did it in El Salvador under JFK through Bush Sr. (For details see my "Behind the Death Squads: An exclusive report on the U.S. role in El Salvadors official terror," The Progressive, May, 1984 ; the US Senate Intelligence Committee report that piece sparked is still classified, but the feeding of questions was confirmed to me by Intelligence Committee Senators. See also my "Confessions of a Death Squad Officer," The Progressive, March, 1986, and my "Comment," The New Yorker, Oct. 15, 1990,[regarding law, the US, and El Salvador]).
In Guatemala under Bush Sr. and Clinton (Obama's foreign policy mentors) the US backed the army's G-2 death squad which kept comprehensive files on dissidents and then electroshocked them or cut off their hands. (The file/ surveillance system was launched for them in the '60s and '70s by CIA/ State/ AID/ special forces; for the history see "Behind the Death Squads," cited above, and the books of Prof. Michael McClintock).
The Americans on the ground in the Guatemalan operation, some of whom I encountered and named, effectively helped to run the G-2 but, themselves, tiptoed around its torture chambers. (See my "C.I.A. Death Squad," The Nation [US], April 17, 1995, "The Country Team," The Nation [US], June 5, 1995, letter exchange with US Ambassador Stroock, The Nation [US], May 29, 1995, and Allan Nairn and Jean-Marie Simon, "Bureaucracy of Death," The New Republic, June 30, 1986).
It was a similar story in Bush Sr. and Clinton's Haiti -- an operation run by today's Obama people -- where the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) helped launch the terrorist group FRAPH, the CIA paid its leader, and FRAPH itsef laid the machetes on Haitian civilians, torturing and killing as US proxies. (See my "Behind Haiti's paramilitaries: our man in FRAPH," The Nation [US], Oct 24, 1994, and "He's our S.O.B.," The Nation [US], Oct. 31, 1994; the story was later confirmed on ABC TV's "This Week" by US Secretary of State Warren Christopher).
In today's Thailand -- a country that hardly comes to mind when most people think of torture -- special police and militaries get US gear and training for things like "target selection" and then go out and torture Thai Malay Muslms in the rebel deep south, and also sometimes (mainly Buddhist) Burmese refugees and exploited northern and west coast workers.
Not long ago I visited a key Thai interrogator who spoke frankly about army/ police/ intel torture and then closed our discussion by saying "Look at this," and invited me into his back room.
It was an up to date museum of plaques, photos and awards from US and Western intelligence, including commendations from the CIA counter-terrorism center (then run by people now staffing Obama), one-on-one photos with high US figures, including George W. Bush, a medal from Bush, various US intel/ FBI/ military training certificates, a photo of him with an Israeli colleague beside a tank in the Occupied Territories, and Mossad, Shin Bet, Singaporean, and other interrogation implements and mementos.
On my way out, the Thai intel man remarked that he was due to re-visit Langley soon.
His role is typical. There are thousands like him worldwide. US proxy torture dwarfs that at Guantanamo.
Many Americans, to their credit, hate torture. The Bush/Cheney escapade exposed that.
But to stop it they must get the facts and see that Obama's ban does not stop it, and indeed could even accord with an increase in US-sponsored torture crime.
In lieu of action, the system will grind on tonight. More shocks, suffocations, deep burns. And the convergence of thousands of complex minds on one simple thought: 'Please, let me die.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
January 26, 2009
How Obama's New Rules Keep Intact
The Torture Ban That Doesn't Ban Torture By ALLAN NAIRN
If you're lying on the slab still breathing, with your torturer hanging over you, you don't much care if he is an American or a mere United States - sponsored trainee.
When President Obama declared flatly this week that "the United States will not torture" many people wrongly believed that he'd shut the practice down, when in fact he'd merely repositioned it.
Obama's Executive Order bans some -- not all -- US officials from torturing but it does not ban any of them, himself included, from sponsoring torture overseas.
Indeed, his policy change affects only a slight percentage of US-culpable tortures and could be completely consistent with an increase in US-backed torture worldwide.
The catch lies in the fact that since Vietnam, when US forces often tortured directly, the US has mainly seen its torture done for it by proxy -- paying, arming, training and guiding foreigners doing it, but usually being careful to keep Americans at least one discreet step removed.
That is, the US tended to do it that way until Bush and Cheney changed protocol, and had many Americans laying on hands, and sometimes taking digital photos.
The result was a public relations fiasco that enraged the US establishment since by exposing US techniques to the world it diminished US power.
But despite the outrage, the fact of the matter was that the Bush/Cheney tortures being done by Americans were a negligible percentage of all of the tortures being done by US clients.
For every torment inflicted directly by Americans in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo and the secret prisons, there were many times more being meted out by US-sponsored foreign forces.
Those forces were and are operating with US military, intelligence, financial or other backing in Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Jordan, Indonesia, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Colombia, Nigeria, and the Philippines, to name some places, not to mention the tortures sans-American-hands by the US-backed Iraqis and Afghans.
What the Obama dictum ostensibly knocks off is that small percentage of torture now done by Americans while retaining the overwhelming bulk of the system's torture, which is done by foreigners under US patronage.
Obama could stop backing foreign forces that torture, but he has chosen not to do so.
His Executive Order instead merely pertains to treatment of "...an individual in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, in any armed conflict..." which means that it doesn't even prohibit direct torture by Americans outside environments of "armed conflict," which is where much torture happens anyway since many repressive regimes aren't in armed conflict.
And even if, as Obama says, "the United States will not torture," it can still pay, train, equip and guide foreign torturers, and see to it that they, and their US patrons, don't face local or international justice.
This is a return to the status quo ante, the torture regime of Ford through Clinton, which, year by year, often produced more US-backed strapped-down agony than was produced during the Bush/Cheney years.
Under the old -- now new again -- proxy regime Americans would, say, teach interrogation/torture, then stand in the next room as the victims screamed, feeding questions to their foreign pupils. That's the way the US did it in El Salvador under JFK through Bush Sr. (For details see my "Behind the Death Squads: An exclusive report on the U.S. role in El Salvadors official terror," The Progressive, May, 1984 ; the US Senate Intelligence Committee report that piece sparked is still classified, but the feeding of questions was confirmed to me by Intelligence Committee Senators. See also my "Confessions of a Death Squad Officer," The Progressive, March, 1986, and my "Comment," The New Yorker, Oct. 15, 1990,[regarding law, the US, and El Salvador]).
In Guatemala under Bush Sr. and Clinton (Obama's foreign policy mentors) the US backed the army's G-2 death squad which kept comprehensive files on dissidents and then electroshocked them or cut off their hands. (The file/ surveillance system was launched for them in the '60s and '70s by CIA/ State/ AID/ special forces; for the history see "Behind the Death Squads," cited above, and the books of Prof. Michael McClintock).
The Americans on the ground in the Guatemalan operation, some of whom I encountered and named, effectively helped to run the G-2 but, themselves, tiptoed around its torture chambers. (See my "C.I.A. Death Squad," The Nation [US], April 17, 1995, "The Country Team," The Nation [US], June 5, 1995, letter exchange with US Ambassador Stroock, The Nation [US], May 29, 1995, and Allan Nairn and Jean-Marie Simon, "Bureaucracy of Death," The New Republic, June 30, 1986).
It was a similar story in Bush Sr. and Clinton's Haiti -- an operation run by today's Obama people -- where the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) helped launch the terrorist group FRAPH, the CIA paid its leader, and FRAPH itsef laid the machetes on Haitian civilians, torturing and killing as US proxies. (See my "Behind Haiti's paramilitaries: our man in FRAPH," The Nation [US], Oct 24, 1994, and "He's our S.O.B.," The Nation [US], Oct. 31, 1994; the story was later confirmed on ABC TV's "This Week" by US Secretary of State Warren Christopher).
In today's Thailand -- a country that hardly comes to mind when most people think of torture -- special police and militaries get US gear and training for things like "target selection" and then go out and torture Thai Malay Muslms in the rebel deep south, and also sometimes (mainly Buddhist) Burmese refugees and exploited northern and west coast workers.
Not long ago I visited a key Thai interrogator who spoke frankly about army/ police/ intel torture and then closed our discussion by saying "Look at this," and invited me into his back room.
It was an up to date museum of plaques, photos and awards from US and Western intelligence, including commendations from the CIA counter-terrorism center (then run by people now staffing Obama), one-on-one photos with high US figures, including George W. Bush, a medal from Bush, various US intel/ FBI/ military training certificates, a photo of him with an Israeli colleague beside a tank in the Occupied Territories, and Mossad, Shin Bet, Singaporean, and other interrogation implements and mementos.
On my way out, the Thai intel man remarked that he was due to re-visit Langley soon.
His role is typical. There are thousands like him worldwide. US proxy torture dwarfs that at Guantanamo.
Many Americans, to their credit, hate torture. The Bush/Cheney escapade exposed that.
But to stop it they must get the facts and see that Obama's ban does not stop it, and indeed could even accord with an increase in US-sponsored torture crime.
In lieu of action, the system will grind on tonight. More shocks, suffocations, deep burns. And the convergence of thousands of complex minds on one simple thought: 'Please, let me die.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:Good
- Music:Chage and Aska
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning against the use of Hydroxycut, a weight-loss supplement linked to serious liver injuries. Hydroxycut's manufacturer has recalled 14 of its products, which are marketed as fat-burners, diet aids, and energy boosters.
The FDA has received 23 reports of Hydroxycut-related adverse effects, including liver damage requiring a liver transplant, seizures, cardiovascular disorders, elevated liver enzymes (an indicator of potential liver injury), and jaundice. In 2007, a 19-year-old man died of liver failure after using Hydroxycut.
In addition to urging consumers to stop using Hydroxycut products, the FDA advises consulting a physician if you're experiencing symptoms that could be associated with use of Hydroxycut. Symptoms of liver injury include jaundice, brown urine, nausea, vomiting, light-colored stools, excessive fatigue, weakness, stomach or abdominal pain, itching, and loss of appetite.
Hydroxycut contains a variety of ingredients, including hydroxycitric acid (a botanical extract linked to liver damage in a number of case reports). The FDA has yet to determine which Hydroxycut ingredients or doses might lead to liver problems.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
The FDA has received 23 reports of Hydroxycut-related adverse effects, including liver damage requiring a liver transplant, seizures, cardiovascular disorders, elevated liver enzymes (an indicator of potential liver injury), and jaundice. In 2007, a 19-year-old man died of liver failure after using Hydroxycut.
In addition to urging consumers to stop using Hydroxycut products, the FDA advises consulting a physician if you're experiencing symptoms that could be associated with use of Hydroxycut. Symptoms of liver injury include jaundice, brown urine, nausea, vomiting, light-colored stools, excessive fatigue, weakness, stomach or abdominal pain, itching, and loss of appetite.
Hydroxycut contains a variety of ingredients, including hydroxycitric acid (a botanical extract linked to liver damage in a number of case reports). The FDA has yet to determine which Hydroxycut ingredients or doses might lead to liver problems.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:Good
- Music:Heartbreak Hotel
There are more types of intensive non-medical therapies available for kids with autism than I can count on my fingers and toes. In a very general sense, these can be broken down into three groups: behavioral, developmental, and "other." There are various different types of behavioral therapies, starting with Applied Behavior Analysis and including Verbal Behavior Analysis, Pivotal Response, and several others. There are at least a dozen developmental therapies, including the Play Project, Floortime, and more. There are developmental therapies based on a coaching model, such as Relationship Development Intervention (RDI) and SonRise. And then, of course, there are the holding therapies, social skills curricula, and more. Parents and professionals who choose one or another of these therapies generally believe that theirs is the most appropriate and effective approach available. While behavior-based therapies have been the most fully researched, those who choose developmental therapies swear by their outcomes. So far as I'm aware, there are no full-scale studies that compare different therapies head to head with similar groups of children. As a result, there's no good way to know whether a child who received Floortime would have done better with RDI or ABA. Certainly, evidence shows that most children with autism improve to varying degrees with intensive therapy, no matter what its name. Is it possible that therapies work NOT because of the philosophy or research behind them, but because they require kids with autism to interact with supportive, interested human beings for many hours a week? Could it be that the very act of engaging with an autistic child - and insisting that the child respond - could be the key to success? What's your opinion.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:Good
- Music:Ami Suzuki
By Mark Blaxill
There’s a familiar rhythm to the most prominent autism gene hunt publications. Their authors hype their newly minted study aggressively in the media. The prestigious journals that publish them lend their imprimatur to press releases that say, “this study is a big deal.” The findings sound impressive in the press release (and the authors get plenty of time on camera and in leading newspapers to tell us how truly impressive they are). In the meantime--in papers that are so densely written that making sense of what they really say requires far more reflection than the media hype cycle permits--skillfully concealed evidence reveals the truly important news in the findings: the authors whisper quietly (if at all) that the new analysis negates the most important findings of some of the most prominent previous gene hunts, while crucial detail on their new findings is often relegated to “supplementary material” that’s not available on the publication date.
All of these patterns will almost certainly be on display today as the latest missive from the autism-genetics establishment bursts forth in the form of not just one, but two major papers in the journal Nature. But I warn you, don’t be fooled by the hype. These two studies report a few moderately interesting findings, which isn’t a bad thing. Broadly speaking, trustworthy and actionable biological findings about autism are something all autism parents should welcome, whether they’re about genes or the environment or the interaction between the two. And indeed, most autism parents I know generally agree that there OUGHT to be some kind of genetic susceptibility that we can discover in autism.
But what’s truly remarkable in these two papers is how so much will be made about so very little.
--
That said, the publication of these two papers--one on the risk of rare mutations (copy number variants) in “autism genes”, the other on common inherited genes (reported here in the form of “single nucleotide polymorphisms” or SNPs) that may increase autism risk--creates an opportunity to review the current state of the great autism gene hunt, something I’ve wanted to do for a while. I’ll break the review into four pieces
1.What you should know about the lead authors and their funding
2.What the paper on “copy number variants” really says
3.Why the paper on common genetic variations will get the most hype
4.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
There’s a familiar rhythm to the most prominent autism gene hunt publications. Their authors hype their newly minted study aggressively in the media. The prestigious journals that publish them lend their imprimatur to press releases that say, “this study is a big deal.” The findings sound impressive in the press release (and the authors get plenty of time on camera and in leading newspapers to tell us how truly impressive they are). In the meantime--in papers that are so densely written that making sense of what they really say requires far more reflection than the media hype cycle permits--skillfully concealed evidence reveals the truly important news in the findings: the authors whisper quietly (if at all) that the new analysis negates the most important findings of some of the most prominent previous gene hunts, while crucial detail on their new findings is often relegated to “supplementary material” that’s not available on the publication date.
All of these patterns will almost certainly be on display today as the latest missive from the autism-genetics establishment bursts forth in the form of not just one, but two major papers in the journal Nature. But I warn you, don’t be fooled by the hype. These two studies report a few moderately interesting findings, which isn’t a bad thing. Broadly speaking, trustworthy and actionable biological findings about autism are something all autism parents should welcome, whether they’re about genes or the environment or the interaction between the two. And indeed, most autism parents I know generally agree that there OUGHT to be some kind of genetic susceptibility that we can discover in autism.
But what’s truly remarkable in these two papers is how so much will be made about so very little.
--
That said, the publication of these two papers--one on the risk of rare mutations (copy number variants) in “autism genes”, the other on common inherited genes (reported here in the form of “single nucleotide polymorphisms” or SNPs) that may increase autism risk--creates an opportunity to review the current state of the great autism gene hunt, something I’ve wanted to do for a while. I’ll break the review into four pieces
1.What you should know about the lead authors and their funding
2.What the paper on “copy number variants” really says
3.Why the paper on common genetic variations will get the most hype
4.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:More emotions
- Music:Sukiyaki
Poker requires a lot of patience and you need to learn the importance of folding to win big longer term.
You need to fold more than 3 out of 4 hands to win over the longer term and the inability to do this is a common mistake made by novice players.
The adrenalin and the desire to win quickly, means a novice player ends up playing far too many hands, as they have no idea of the importance of folding to make longer term gains
Lets look at why the importance of folding when playing Texas Holdem.
Fact: A good player will need fold most hands, approximately 80% in a 10-player game.
You will often see novice players in Texas holdem making the mistake of paying to see the flop and then chasing straight and flush draws or hoping a low pair stands up against other players.
Holdem is HIGH card game!
The players holding two good high cards have the best chance at the best hand or a draw to the best hand after the flop.
Therefore only play strong hands that will stand a raise or multiple raises from an early betting position.
Play medium strength and other playable hands from the later positions if, you have a good chance of seeing the flop at a good price to you.
Play strong high hands MOST of the time, and when you receive them play them very aggressively.
You need to take all the raises you can get. If you dont reduce the number of players your chances of taking the pot are considerably reduced.
A high cards game requires patience
Always remember: Texas Holdem, more than anything else, is a game of high cards and therefore a game of patience. Low cards will simply not pay for themselves in the long run.
The importance of your starting hand
When you look at your two hole cards, if theyre not both big enough, you dont belong in the pot, its as simple as that.
The decision you make on how to play your first two cards is of vital importance to your probability of winning the pot, so you need to make the right decision at this vital point in the game.
Determining a good hand
Keep in mind two points:
1. The two cards you hold are the only cards that set you apart from other players at the table and give you a chance to win.
2. All of the face-up cards are community cards, shared by you and ALL the other players
You need to concentrate on what those cards mean to someone elses hand, as much as concentrating on what they could mean to your hand.
Focus on your opponents possibilities of getting a straight or a flush.
How do you know if your cards are good?
This depends on how many players are in the game, but as a general rule you should consider folding before the flop if you have two non-pair cards, both less than 10.
After seeing the flop, dont be afraid to cut your losses, it will save you money longer term.
A common mistake made by novices is to decide their in anyway, so they may as well chance their luck.
The probability of winning however is firmly against them.
Texas holdem is a game of patience and you need to learn the importance of folding to win big longer term.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
You need to fold more than 3 out of 4 hands to win over the longer term and the inability to do this is a common mistake made by novice players.
The adrenalin and the desire to win quickly, means a novice player ends up playing far too many hands, as they have no idea of the importance of folding to make longer term gains
Lets look at why the importance of folding when playing Texas Holdem.
Fact: A good player will need fold most hands, approximately 80% in a 10-player game.
You will often see novice players in Texas holdem making the mistake of paying to see the flop and then chasing straight and flush draws or hoping a low pair stands up against other players.
Holdem is HIGH card game!
The players holding two good high cards have the best chance at the best hand or a draw to the best hand after the flop.
Therefore only play strong hands that will stand a raise or multiple raises from an early betting position.
Play medium strength and other playable hands from the later positions if, you have a good chance of seeing the flop at a good price to you.
Play strong high hands MOST of the time, and when you receive them play them very aggressively.
You need to take all the raises you can get. If you dont reduce the number of players your chances of taking the pot are considerably reduced.
A high cards game requires patience
Always remember: Texas Holdem, more than anything else, is a game of high cards and therefore a game of patience. Low cards will simply not pay for themselves in the long run.
The importance of your starting hand
When you look at your two hole cards, if theyre not both big enough, you dont belong in the pot, its as simple as that.
The decision you make on how to play your first two cards is of vital importance to your probability of winning the pot, so you need to make the right decision at this vital point in the game.
Determining a good hand
Keep in mind two points:
1. The two cards you hold are the only cards that set you apart from other players at the table and give you a chance to win.
2. All of the face-up cards are community cards, shared by you and ALL the other players
You need to concentrate on what those cards mean to someone elses hand, as much as concentrating on what they could mean to your hand.
Focus on your opponents possibilities of getting a straight or a flush.
How do you know if your cards are good?
This depends on how many players are in the game, but as a general rule you should consider folding before the flop if you have two non-pair cards, both less than 10.
After seeing the flop, dont be afraid to cut your losses, it will save you money longer term.
A common mistake made by novices is to decide their in anyway, so they may as well chance their luck.
The probability of winning however is firmly against them.
Texas holdem is a game of patience and you need to learn the importance of folding to win big longer term.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:More emotions
- Music:Utada Hikaru
I listened to the doctor as she revealed her diagnosis. I knew I felt worse but I listened carefully as I could while observing my wifes reactions. I couldnt react much to the info myself and wasnt as shocked by it, It was actually a source of potential optimism to my way of thinking.
After multiple daily dosing of risperdal finally a diagnosis, an identifying lable, schizophrenia such a big word at last finally I had something I could learn about.
I couldnt concentrate much at the time and when she said that I probably had it all of my life that I just hid it I was unable to explain the events of my entire life off of the top of my head.
I thought my disease was getting worse well my symptoms were I couldnt concentrate as well and I was more tired out than before. It could have been that the disease had gotten progressively worse. It could have been from the nerve damage caused by the haldol. It could have been that the risperdal was causing my symptoms to get worse since I thought it was causing me other problems also. When she told me that it takes a while before the drug risperdal helps I thought it must be the disease if the risperdal hasnt started working yet because if it was because of the haldol damage it should get better as more time went by not worse.
I thought it was very interesting how she had used her psychiatric craft to determine through esoteric processes of mystical proportion for the divination of my lifes history of mental health, a feat which no doctor had ever demonstrated before. I thought it was a good idea to review my lifes health history even thogh I had never felt this sickness before.
Some of the logic in her abstract reasoning lost merit upon closer observation such as how could I hide something for 37 years without ever knowing that I was hiding it and how could I hide something if I didnt know what it was that I was hiding. I thought it was worth a look anyway just to see what I might find.
The doctors Prophesy of the future didnt have the same effect on me as it did my wife.
It was pretty grim alright but I didnt know enough about schizophrenia other than what she told me to determine how accurate her prophesy of the future might be and since I found holes in the logic that she divined mysteriously about my past I was more skeptical of her ability to accurately predict the future. I knew she was basing her knowledge on the treatment outcomes that she was familiar with and I considered that the reason patients brains deteriorated and their conditions got worse each time they were hospitalized then perhaps it might be directly related to the method of treatment rather than the disease itself.
I was glad she helped me to identify it so I could learn about it.
I wondered how she learned my diagnosis if the risperdal hadnt started working yet she must have learned from the nerve damage caused by the haldol, yeah that must have been it because she changed the haldol as it was contra-indicated to risperdal and yet she didnt change the daily dosing of risperdal when she revealed her diagnosis.
I felt a little more ill than I did before when I was in college but I thought it was the progression of the disease, I didnt know if it was fatal or how much time I would have to be able to learn about it before it deteriorated by brain to the point that I was completely unable to learn about it. I had a sense of urgency to learn as much as I could as fast as I was able to.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
After multiple daily dosing of risperdal finally a diagnosis, an identifying lable, schizophrenia such a big word at last finally I had something I could learn about.
I couldnt concentrate much at the time and when she said that I probably had it all of my life that I just hid it I was unable to explain the events of my entire life off of the top of my head.
I thought my disease was getting worse well my symptoms were I couldnt concentrate as well and I was more tired out than before. It could have been that the disease had gotten progressively worse. It could have been from the nerve damage caused by the haldol. It could have been that the risperdal was causing my symptoms to get worse since I thought it was causing me other problems also. When she told me that it takes a while before the drug risperdal helps I thought it must be the disease if the risperdal hasnt started working yet because if it was because of the haldol damage it should get better as more time went by not worse.
I thought it was very interesting how she had used her psychiatric craft to determine through esoteric processes of mystical proportion for the divination of my lifes history of mental health, a feat which no doctor had ever demonstrated before. I thought it was a good idea to review my lifes health history even thogh I had never felt this sickness before.
Some of the logic in her abstract reasoning lost merit upon closer observation such as how could I hide something for 37 years without ever knowing that I was hiding it and how could I hide something if I didnt know what it was that I was hiding. I thought it was worth a look anyway just to see what I might find.
The doctors Prophesy of the future didnt have the same effect on me as it did my wife.
It was pretty grim alright but I didnt know enough about schizophrenia other than what she told me to determine how accurate her prophesy of the future might be and since I found holes in the logic that she divined mysteriously about my past I was more skeptical of her ability to accurately predict the future. I knew she was basing her knowledge on the treatment outcomes that she was familiar with and I considered that the reason patients brains deteriorated and their conditions got worse each time they were hospitalized then perhaps it might be directly related to the method of treatment rather than the disease itself.
I was glad she helped me to identify it so I could learn about it.
I wondered how she learned my diagnosis if the risperdal hadnt started working yet she must have learned from the nerve damage caused by the haldol, yeah that must have been it because she changed the haldol as it was contra-indicated to risperdal and yet she didnt change the daily dosing of risperdal when she revealed her diagnosis.
I felt a little more ill than I did before when I was in college but I thought it was the progression of the disease, I didnt know if it was fatal or how much time I would have to be able to learn about it before it deteriorated by brain to the point that I was completely unable to learn about it. I had a sense of urgency to learn as much as I could as fast as I was able to.
Similar posts: what is risperdal
- Mood:Very good
- Music:Utada Hikaru
